Friday, December 21, 2012

பறப்பியல் சார்ந்த சொற்கள் from facebook

பறப்பியல் சார்ந்த சொற்கள்

aviation = பறப்பியல், வானோடியல்; aviator = வானோடி
aeroplane, விமானம் = வான்பறனை; plane = பறனை; aircraft = வானூர்தி; light aircraft= இலகு வானூர்தி,
civil aircraft = குடிவர் வானூர்தி, military aircraft = படைய வானூர்தி; bush plane = புதர்ப் பறனை; delta wing = முக்கோணச் சிறகை
airbus = வானுந்து; air liner = வானிழுனை; low cost -carrier = இழிவிலை (வான்)காவி, குறைந்த விலை வான்காவி
jet plane = தாரைப் பறனை; jet liner = தாரை இழுனை; business jet = பொதினத் தாரை
helicopter = உலங்கூர்தி, சுரினை; heliports = சுரினைப்புகல்; helipad = சுரினைமணை
blimp = வானேதல் (ஏதல் = கப்பல்); airship = வான் கப்பல்; zeppelin = வளிக்கூடு; balloon = பூதி
parachute = பரக்கூடு
fixed-wing aircraft = நிலைச்சிறகு வானூர்தி; rotorcraft = சுழலூர்தி
unmanned aircraft = ஆளில்லா வானூர்தி
wide-body aircraft = வியனுடல் வானூர்தி
supersonic aircraft = மிகையொலி வானூர்தி, மிகையொலியன்; hypersonic = மீயொலி, மீயொலியன்
passenger aircraft = பயணிகள் வானூர்தி; cargo aircraft= சரக்குப் பறனை

airport = வான்புகல், வான்நிலையம், வானூர்தி நிலையம்; airstrip = வான்பொல்லம்; aerodrome = வான்புலம்; airfield = வான்களம்
STOL - short take-off and landing - = குறு தரையிறக்கமும் மேலெழுதலும்
airbase = வான்(படைத்)தளம்; bomber = குண்டு இற்றி, குண்டுவீசி
terminal = முனையம்; aisle = இடைகழி; gate =கதவம்
lounge = பற்றகம், நீட்டி; lobby = கூடம்
information counter = உள்ளுரும எண்ணகம் ; ticket counter = பயணச்சீட்டு எண்ணகம் (நன்றி அருளியார்!);
hangar = நிழற்கூடம்; apron = வான்தரணம்
flight = பறப்பு; domestic flight = உடமிப்புப் பறப்பு; point to point flights = முனையடிப் பறப்புகள்; direct flights = நேரடிப் பறப்புகள்;
non-stop flights = நிறுத்தாப் பறப்புகள்; transit = துரந்தை
air traffic = வான் துரப்பு
runway = ஓடுபாதை; taxiway = இணைவழி; tankfarm = தாங்கற்பண்ணை; ramp = தொடுபாலம்;
runway edge lighting = ஓடுபாதை விளிம்பு விளக்குகள்; access road = அணுக்க சாலை; boarding walkway = பட்டிகை நடைபாதை; service road = சேவைச் சாலை
shuttle bus = நாழியுந்து
conveyor belt = ஏந்தும் பட்டி
control tower = கட்டுறற் கோபுரம்; towered = கோபுரங் கொண்ட; non-towered= கோபுரமில்லா
business class = பொதின வகுப்பு; economy class = பொருண்மிய வகுப்பு
take off = விட்டெழுகை, விட்டெடுப்பு; departure = புறப்பாடு
landing = நிலைக் குற்றல்; crash landing = மோதி நிலைக்குற்றல்; arrivals = வருகைகள்
board = பட்டி; boarding= பட்டித்தல்; pass port= புகற் கடவு, கடவுச் சீட்டு ; boarding pass = பட்டிகைக் கடவு
visa = நுழைமதி ; deportation = நாடுகடத்தல், புகலகற்றல்
seat belt = இருக்கைப் பட்டி
duty free shop = வரியிலாக் கடை; customs = சுங்கம், ஆயம்; immigration = குடிவழி
airport authorities = வான்புகல் ஆணத்திகள்
travel itenary = பயண இட்டிகை
time line = காலக்கோடு; timetables = நேர அட்டவணைகள்; reservation = இடப்பதிவு
cancellation = குற்றெடுத்தல் / குற்றுதல்
airlines, airways = வான்தட, வான்வழி நிறுவனங்கள்
travels = பயணச் சேவையர்
check in = கவ்வி உள்ளுதல், உள் ஆய்தல்
check out = கவ்வி வெள்ளுதல், வெளி ஆய்தல்
pilot = வலவர் /ன்; co-pilot = துணை வலவர் /ன்; cockpit = வலவனறை; autopilot = தானிவலவன்
crew = கும்பு; galley = கலம்
second officer = இரண்டாம் அதிகாரி
airhost = வானோம்பர், வான் கொளுவர்; airhostess = வானோம்பி, வான் கொளுவர்
flight attendant = பறப்பு அணுக்கர்
flight steward / stewardess = பறப்புச் சேவைப் பொறுப்பாளர்
passenger = செலவர், பயணி; wayfarer= கடவர்; baggage = உடைமை; jet lag = பறப்பு இழுவை/ இழுபாடு

air navigation = வான் நாவாயகைப்பு
aeronautics = வானூர்த்தியல்
avionics = பறப்புமின்னியல்

GPS = கோ.பொ.க (கோளகை பொதிப்புறு கட்டகம்)
radar = கதுவீ (நன்றி அருளியார்!)
turbine = துருவளை; turbojet engine = துருவுத்தாரை இயங்குள் / இயங்குபொறி/ எந்திரம்; jet engine = தாரை இயங்குள்
engine failure = இயங்குள் / இயங்குபொறி / எந்திரப் பழுது
aileron = உருட்டிறக்கை
control console = கட்டுறல் ஆள்பலகை /செறுகை
flap = சிறகை
flight instruments= பறனைக் கருவிகள்
fly-by-wire = மின்-சார் பறப்பு
propeller = நுந்தம்
combustion = கனற்சி (நன்றி மணவையார்!); aerosol = காற்றுத்தூசு
aviation fuel = பறப்பு எரிபொருள்
aviation noise = பறப்பியல் நெறு
visual flight rules = விழியப் பறப்பு விதிகள்
instrument flight rules = கருவிப் பறப்பு விதிகள்
wind cone = காற்கொனை
aerodynamics = காற்றுத் தினவியல்
airport code = வான்புகற் குறியீடு
yoke, joystick = நுகப்பிடி, மகிழ்பிடி

தகவல் வழங்கியவர் -சிவலிங்கம் பிரியா

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Foreign Dacoit's Invasion (FDI) in retail......FROM NEW INDIAN EXPRESS






from The New Indian Expresss
14th December 2012 11:51 PM
Walmart will be permitted by the UPA government to do in India what it has not been permitted to do in New York. Opposition to Walmart in New York is much like the opposition voiced in India — its history of low wages, poor employee benefits, cannabalising small businesses and endangering existing jobs. The machinations and subversion in obtaining Parliament’s numbers through UPA’S CBI prone allies have been witnessed by the nation.
Despite being heralded by this questionable and highly unethical red carpet, the timing couldn’t have been worse. In November, there were reports that several high level Walmart employees in India were suspended because of a bribery scandal in India, Mexico and China. Easy Day, owned by Bharti Walmart, has been accused of having received illegal investments of $100 million in violation of India’s FDI laws, via its joint venture partner Bharti, into which the Reserve Bank of India is reported to be enquiring.
The day after the dubious unparliamentary approval for FDI in retail, reports appeared that as per the lobbying disclosure reports filed by Walmart with the US Senate, the company has spent close to $25 million (about `125 crore) since 2008 on its various lobbying activities, including on issues related to ‘enhanced market access for investment in India’.
Not a very nice way to make a debut in any country. With this background, naturally, questions are being asked. What was this lobbying money spent for? Was it spent in the US or in India? Who were the Indians who were the lobbyist’s targets? What were the lobbying activities, even if they happened in the US? Does this imply that Indian law-makers were lobbied in the US, and legislate in response to US lobbying? What is the difference between lobbying and bribing?
The mood of the Congress in Parliament regarding FDI in retail resembled the nuclear Bill mood, when it was willing to sacrifice an ally and risk its government for an issue that had least relevance to the development or progress of the country. The conclusions are obvious. A noticeable difference, however, was that Rahul Gandhi did not pipe up that Walmart was essential because impoverished Kalavati should have the taste of a mall.
I now present two conclusive arguments that have made me a sworn opponent of FDI in retail in India. Walmart may be the largest multinational retailer and the biggest private employer in the world, but what frightens me is not its size, but it’s bad reputation and continuous malpractice regarding principles of business probity. There has been heated debate whether FDI in retail is really going to bring prosperity and joy into the life of the aam agriculturalist, informal retailer, hawker, kirana shop owner or local intermediary. Walmart’s business record in Mexico, South Africa, Chile, Thailand and China, provides adequate evidence that it neither improved wages or quality of life of workers or agricultural income. On the contrary, because of their power to start with low prices, they drive out other competitors out of business, most importantly small businesses like kirana shops; then start monopolistic price mechanisms of buying the lowest and selling the highest, replace the existing intermediaries with their own corporate middlemen, and exercise a complete control over the retail market.
Walmart’s corruption to establish itself in Mexico is well-documented in a New York Times report that details heavy bribery by Walmart Mexico, based on evidence provided by an insider lawyer whistleblower, Sergio Cicero. His allegations were confirmed by a preliminary enquiry conducted by a veteran FBI agent, including payment of $16 million in ‘donations’ to local politicians and their organisation. The company’s senior executives defended the company by arguing that ‘that was how the business was done in that country and what they have done was essential for success of their commercial ventures’.
Well, when a retailer trader with Walmart’s antecedents joins hands with the most corrupt government that India has seen, the ensuing synergy will cause a looting explosion on the unfortunate aam aadmi of this country, who will be robbed of his livelihood and his purse. It is for this reason alone that this monster must be prevented from landing in our mist. FDI is plainly ‘Foreign Dacoit’s Invasion’.
In ‘The Drivers and Dynamics of Illicit Financial Flows from India: 1948-2008’, Global Financial Integrity (GFI) has estimated that from 1948 to 2008 a total of $213.2 billion has been shifted out of India through illicit outflows. It needs to be ascertained whether this money has at least partly already returned to India. FDI statistics perhaps point to this fact. As per data released by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, the two topmost sources of the cumulative equity inflows from April 2000 to March 2011 are Mauritius (41.80 per cent) and Singapore (9.17 per cent). Mauritius and Singapore with their small economies cannot be the sources of such huge investments and it is apparent that the investments are routed through these jurisdictions for avoidance of taxes and/or for concealing the identities from the revenue authorities of the ultimate investors, many of whom could actually be Indian residents, who have invested in their own companies, though a process known as round tripping.
Investment in the Indian Stock Market through Participatory Notes (PNs) is another way through which black money holders re-invest in India, as the PNs are held in the name of the FIIs, though the profits go to the investors, through specifically designed contracts. PNs/ODIs can be freely traded and easily transferred without disclosing the identity of the actual beneficiaries.
The above two paragraphs are not my words. They are composed and authorised by the gentleman who has been recently elected as the president of this country in his white paper on black money, from the section ‘Has the money transferred abroad illicitly returned’? For a change the gentleman who had prevented the recovery and repatriation of stolen wealth uttered a great truth and confirmed that money transferred abroad is being illicitly returned under the guise of FDI.
In short, FDI is going to be the biggest money laundering operation, earning wealth with stolen money. It is doubtful whether even small crumbs will be thrown at the grovelling poor of this country.
Ram Jethmalani is an eminent jurist and Rajya Sabha member

Thursday, December 13, 2012

The Hindu : Opinion / Open Page : FDI in retail? say a big NO

The Hindu : Opinion / Open Page : FDI in retail? say a big NO



FDI is a debt inflow or liability foreign exchange because the profits or returns it generates will have to be repatriated. Will FDI in retail, single brand, banking or insurance enhance our foreign exchange earning capacity? Do they bring technology to the economy?

There is so much of talk going around in all circles regarding FDI. Politicians, for obvious reasons, speak a language of their own, driven by ulterior motives. Most of the times, they are not even knowledgeable to understand the long term consequences of the populist measures and policies they adopt. It would be in the fitness of things if the whole thing is explained in simple and elementary terms.

FDI is Foreign Direct Investment. Direct Investment is of two types: Domestic Direct Investment (DDI) and Foreign Direct Investment. DDI is done in domestic currency (rupee in India) and FDI brings in foreign exchange.

Now, the question arises why FDI. The need for FDI is justified only in two situations – (1) when DDI is inadequate or (2) when foreign exchange is required. On the DDI front, the position as obtained in our country is fairly sound. Banks are flush with funds; the domestic savings rate is one of the highest in the world; market capitalisation, constantly on the rise, makes available investible funds; and DFIs have huge unutilised funds waiting to be deployed in feasible projects. It is gung-ho all around. Therefore, domestically speaking, there is no shortfall of funds for investment.

As for foreign exchange, it is either an asset or liability, depending upon its repatriability. If it is repatriable (i.e., to be returned or repaid in the form of foreign exchange itself), it is a liability. If not, it is an asset. This way, only three sources of foreign exchange – (1) exports of goods and services, (2) NRO accounts in banks and (3) Foreign Aid — qualify as assets. The rest are liabilities like FCNR & NRE deposits of NRIs; FDIs; FIIs and foreign exchange loans from foreign governments and agencies. For convenience, let’s call one asset foreign exchange and the other liability foreign exchange. Some people choose to call them non-debt and debt inflows respectively.

FDI is a debt inflow or liability foreign exchange. Why? Simple, because the profits or returns it generates will have to be repatriated in foreign exchange. Secondly, all the men, material and merchandise imported in the years to come will have to be paid in foreign exchange. Finally, at the time of winding up/selling off, the proceeds will flow out of the country in foreign exchange. And, it is noteworthy here, all this will end up in the outflow of foreign exchange, many times more than the initial inflow. So, every FDI is a clear-cut case of liability foreign exchange.

All the above is about the supply-side of foreign exchange. Now, let’s examine the demand side. The question is – why is foreign exchange needed at all? Based on long-term benefits to the economy, the demand for it can be classified into consumption and construction. Consumption demand is the demand for foreign exchange to import consumption items like gold, oil, tourism and FMCG — all those areas where funds are just blown. On the contrary, ‘construction’ stands for all those areas which promote exports, substitute imports, strengthen the infrastructure of the country and make it more competitive globally.

So, we have the demand for foreign exchange classified into two and its supply also into two. This can be neatly depicted graphically in a Foreign Exchange Desirability Matrix.

The table makes it amply clear that Asset Foreign Exchange casts no negative impact on the economy, regardless of whether it is used for construction or consumption purposes. However, liability foreign exchange needs to be restricted to ‘construction’ purposes, as the consequences of putting it to consumption needs are grave.

Now, why should we go in for liability foreign exchange, like FDI, at all, if it is not for any export promotion, import substitution or any capacity construction purpose? Well, if we indulge in the luxury of blowing liability foreign exchange on non-developmental consumption items, we’ll end up worsening our foreign exchange debt position (we are already in the doldrums with mounting pressure on our capital account of balance of payments, owing to increasing deficits in our balance of trade account year by year).

In fact, until we have any project/avenue in hand which will, in times to come, yield foreign exchange more than its repayment schedule warrants, the inflow of liability foreign exchange should be outrightly avoided.

The service sector is comprised of marketing (wholesale and retail), banking, insurance, civil aviation, education, tourism, medical & health, telecommunication and software, etc. All these fall either in the construction category like education, medical and health, telecommunication and Software or consumption like marketing, insurance, banking and tourism.

Incidentally, in marketing, there is nothing like technology. It’s all about consumption, where the sole elements are Brand and Supply Chain Management; again nothing basic or infrastructural or technology enhancing. Further, the question arises — will FDI in sectors like retail, single brand, banking or insurance enhance our foreign exchange earning capacity? A big NO. Do they bring technology to the economy? Again, a big NO. Hence, FDI in ‘consumption’ sectors deserves to be outrightly rejected. If it is not, it would simply mean the government is not working in the interest of the economy, but is unscrupulously catering to vested interests.

IMPORTING TECHNOLOGY

They say, had FDI not come in, our automobile, telecommunication, aviation, banking and many other industries would not have reached global standards. I would say that instead of allowing foreign capital to set up shop here, the country should have used foreign exchange to just import technology, if needed; and set up the same industries with domestic capital. No liability foreign exchange; no profits going out of the country; domestic consumers getting the same products; and the fruits of exports being reaped by domestic firms and not foreign — all the way a win-win situation for us.

But, being blind to the undercurrents, we instead allowed foreign firms to set up bases here, milk the domestic market and carry back huge profits. The foreign exchange that flowed in by way of FDI was blown in consumption areas like gold and oil.

In the ensuing debate, lots of comparisons are being made with the U.S., the U.K., China and Japan. The question is: are we at the same level of development to indulge in the luxury of comparing ourselves with them?

With no apparent gain for the economy in the long-run on the table, there cannot be a more foolish act for any country than inviting foreigners to set up shop on its own territory. First, it is a clear signal of allowing them to reap profits here and take them back. Second, it is telling the world, loud and clear, that we, by ourselves, are incompetent and inefficient. If a foreign entity pushes for entry in the economy, it will still make sense. It wants to expand its market and reap profits. But what is the compulsion for a host country to insist that a foreign entity come and set up shop here?

Historically, no economy has ever developed on foreign capital. In the industrial revolutions of various nations, the crucial factors that have been instrumental are (1) indigenous mobilisation of resources, (2) domestic technological development and application (3) strategic management and (4) support from the governments, mostly to ward off external pressures. Cases of foreign investment are few and far between.

Let us keep in mind that foreign exchange is both a boon and bane, to determine which each of its inflow needs to be individually assessed for its costs and benefits, before allowing it.

(Professor Anupam Bhargava, a PhD in Management, is a former AGM of SBI. He is now Adviser and Research Guide at Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (Deemed University), Udaipur. Email: anupambhargava58@gmail.com)

OPINIONS FROM THE HINDU READERS:

FDI in retail will eventually lead to most national resources being
owned by foreign entities and the locals getting relegated to a
permanent status as low wage employees, a situation that obtains in many
South American countries and elsewhere. Costa Rica is a classic example
where all banana plantations are now owned by American multinationals
and the Costa Rican slaves as a day laborer. The Indian politicians
should stop selling the country for personal profit and for the profit
of the few at the top.

from:  V. Ramaswami

The foreign retail chains will also impose their food culture and life style on us through advertising.Cola,burgers,preserved foods,baby foods will all adorn the supermarket shelves and we will start
consuming them more and more.Cancer,kidney-heart ailments will all increase when we move away from our natural food habits to these preserved and formulated foods!And of course the beneficery will be again the multinational drug industry!The retail chain's slogan would be spend more, when actualy it should be spend less and conserve more! Look at the small retail businesses in countries like US and UK, they are almost nonexistent now. And also the goods that these retail businesses purchase are from around the globe to get competitive prices. Hence the local businesses die very quickly. Ask the US people about WalMart and they will agree that WalMart makes more profit for itself and the Chinese economy because most of its goods are imported from China. Or ask the farmers of UK, where the retail stores import even ginger and garlic from China or bananas from South America or Africa.
 The question of OWNERSHIP. The problem is that companies like carefour, wal-mart etc. will OWN the real estate, the warehouses, the cold storage, the supply vehicles, even the employees. Employees, including store managers, will be simply working at the places without having any OWNERSHIP of anything. They will have salaries just sufficient to make them happy.
Currently our system is excellent because the Kirana store is OWNED by the manager, the vehicles are OWNED by either driver or a delivery services company, the food is OWNED and sold at competitive local prices by the farmer, etc. We dont want a system where everything is OWNED by the multinational and everyone else is a employee.

from:  RVishwanath

TheUPA government has gone in for big bang reforms only to satisfy the rating agencies and the international finance capital. Our economy was saved from crumbling during the recent crisis only because we have restricted FDI in key sectors. The entry of global retailers like Walmart will have a devastating impact on employment. Experience has shown that the MNCs have a greater monopolistic power over both farmers and consumers and they manipulate the prices.

V.V.K. Suresh,
FDI in retail will affect not only small retailers but also wholesalers. Retail giants have two formats — the Easy Day format (retail) and the Cash & Carry format (wholesale). The Cash & Carry format is dangerous for the wholesalers because MNCs bargain and buy stocks in huge quantities and sell them on very narrow margins. They manage to profit from these margins because they have a huge product line. The Cash & Carry store in Punjab attracts a large number of wholesalers from Delhi and adjoining areas. If New Delhi’s market can be disturbed by these giants, we can imagine the situation in the rest of the country.
Farhan Alam,


from Indian Express.. FDI in retail

Indian Express

 By S Gurumurthy
Selling India’s retail wholesale
Finally, FDI in retail has arrived. The collapse of the Rupee by one-fifth in just weeks,dwindling forex inflows and net FII outflows have forced a desperate government to sellIndia’s retail trade wholesale. Corporate and multinational lobbying to induct FDI in retail,branding it as “big ticket reform”, has been intense in the last few years. The lobbies havewon. India has lost. The decision betrays a metropolitan bias; and exposes lack ofunderstanding of India’s agricultural and rural economy. That it will endlessly damage thehuge 1.2 million strong community-run retail business in India is undisputed. But the lessknown truth is that it will destroy food security in rural India. How? Read on.The principal lobby argument for FDI in retail is that the deep pocket and expertise ofWalmarts to establish supply chain will make rural areas and farmers prosperous. It does notneed a seer to say how illiterate those who advocate this view are about rural India. Thereport of the “Working Group of the Planning Commission on Agricultural Marketing,Infrastructure, and Policy Required for Internal and External Trade” for the XI Five Year Plan[2007-12], read along with the 19th Report of the Standing Committee of Parliament onFood, Consumer Affairs, and Public Distribution [2006-07] submitted to Parliament drawsthe true picture of the rural/agricultural India. Compare the farms in India with those in theWest. A total of 58.8 million of small and marginal farming families, that is over 32 crorerural people, live on farming in India. Their farm size is 5 acres or less. In contrast, in Canada,it is 1798 acres; in US, 1089 acres; in Australia, 17975 acres; in France, 274 acres; in UK, 432acres. The US farm size is 250 times larger than the Indian; the Australian farms, 4000 times!Therefore, Farm Gate to Walmart supply chain that works in the US/West cannot beimagined here. Now look at how - and how much of - the Indian farm produce is brought tothe market.The Farm Gate to Walmart theory is founded on the elimination of not only middlemen butalso small farmers by making farming contractual and corporate to reap economics of scale.It ignores global studies and Indian experience that affirm that economics of scale does notoperate in agriculture. Actually smaller farms gives better production. The SMFs in Indiafarm about 34% of the cultivated area, but produce 41% of food grains; their productivity is33% higher. Replace small farms by large ones. Nation’s food production will instantly fall by7%. Not just food. SMFs produce most of the 100.9 million tons of milk. So, unless half therural population is done away with, small farming cannot be dispensed with. The WorkingGroup concluded: “The small and marginal farmers are certainly going to stay for a long time in India - though they are going to face a number of challenges. Therefore what happens tosmall and marginal farmers has implications for the entire economy”. More critical is thatwhat SMFs produce, they consume and share with the farm labour; they have no surplus tosell. See how Walmarts will destroy their food security.A less known, stunning truth about rural India is that more than 60% of India’s foodproduction does not enter commercial stream at all, but gets distributed, consumed withinthe villages. It is retained or stored by farmers for consumption, payment of wages in kind tofarm labour; and for use as seed and feedstock for animals; for sale within the village. Even ifa small part of the 60% un-marketed food production is drawn into the market throughsupply chain which Walmarts will establish, that will mean urban pricing in rural areas. CanSMFs and landless labour afford the market price and buy their food? Never. If that happens,will that what happened Alfanso mango in Konkan and Kerala fish not happen to rural foodalso? The Konkan people see, but don’t eat Alfanso but only export it for high prices andspend that money on urban goods. And the Kerala fishermen fish and export it at high rates,get cash and drink foreign whisky! The FDI in retail undoubtedly puts at risk, t he foodsecurity of SMFs and agriculture labour who who constitute 2/3 of India’s population, as thesupply chain of Walmarts will make Alfanso out of the basic food grains in rural areas.How does the marketable surplus of 40 percent of food produced by Indian farmers crossthe village borders and enter the market? Nine out of ten tons [35%] of the surplus [of 40%]that enters the commercial stream enter the market through traditional Haats, Shandies,Fairs whose number is estimated at 47000. Only the balance of 5% directly enters the 6359traditional wholesale Mandis organised under government supervision. Here begins themodern market economy where the surplus 40% of national production gets traded. This isfrom where the government procures and stocks food for the nation!How do the Haats/Shandies function? Some 3/4th of them are held once a week; 1/5thtwice a week; 1/20th on daily basis; one Haat covers some 14 villages; all put together coveralmost the entire 6.58 lakh Indian villages. Some 2/3rd are held at 16 km from the villages;1/4th at between 6 and 15 km; a tenth at less than 5 km. More than a third of the buyerswalk to the Haat; 1/3 use bicycle; the rest use bullock carts, even motorised vehicles.According to the Working Group, at the Haats, the farmers not just trade, but also exchangesocial and cultural information about neighbourhood areas, settle marriages and disputes,make crop choice and discuss resource allocation. Therefore, the Working Grouprecommended that instead of asking the farmers to come to government for knowing whatthey should do and should not, the government should open its offices at the place wheremillions meet at the Haats. Now, by its retail FDI policy, the UPA government expectsWalmart to go where the Planning Commission Working group had asked the government togo! See how the agricultural India is far removed from even the government. NationalSample Survey data shockingly reveals that 7 out of 10 Indian farmers had not even heard es not even heard - of the Minimum Support Price [MSP] announced by the governmentwith lot of fanfare; 81% of the those who have heard of it do not know - yes do not know -how to use it! This is because the MSP system operates only in Wholesale Mandis, not atHaats. That is why the Working Group wants the government to go to Haats. The StandingCommittee rightly asked the government ‘how will farmers who do not know what MSP is,make use of futures market’. The government, which had no answer, finally banned forwardtrading in foodgrain.QED: Thanks to FDI in retail, twelve million community-run retail shops are in danger; andrural food security at risk. This is UPA government’s gift for 2012 and onwards

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

FROM QUORA.COM....Direct Cash Transfer... different views...


direct cash transfer




An article in newspaper:
QUOTE:

The direct cash transfers scheme (DCTS), the one truly revolutionary  subsidies reform scheme in UPA-2, is heading for the reefs even before  it has been rolled out. It looks likely to be sacrificed on

the altar of  electoral greed.
The scheme, which will use the Aadhaar Unique ID card to hand over  cash to beneficiaries, is being rushed through by the Prime Minister  when the implementation machinery for handling millions of

subsidy  transfers every month is rudimentary and untested at best.
This is happening because of a unique confluence of reformist hopes and aam aadmi political calculations, with Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi symbolising the two ends of the spectrum. Cheered on

by right-wing  economists, who see the scheme as a way to reduce leakages in subsidies,  leading to their ultimate reduction, and Congress party opportunists,  who see electoral gains by putting money

directly in the hands of the  electorate, the cash transfer scheme is in danger of being hijacked for  short-term ends. It could even end up damaging the long-term goals of  this reform measure.
In the process, the economy may end up being horribly damaged as cash  transfers accelerate the shift of resources from exchequer to voter at a  time when growth is slowing down and the government

is cutting more  productive investment expenditure to make ends meet. The premature  launch of cash transfers may even mark the end of all other reforms that  were supposedly in the pipeline.
The PM backs the scheme because it is supposed to cut down on subsidies by eliminating those not entitled to them, using the Aadhaar identification process. Sonia Gandhi has no such intention – at

least before 2014. Her political objective  is not to eliminate any constituency by identifying leakages. She has  bought into the PM’s dream only to the extent that existing subsidies  can be paid out like

legal bribes to the voter. As Firstpost noted some time ago, “in all areas where the UID is almost done, cash  transfers will mean every family will get money in the range of Rs  3,000-14,000 per annum,

depending on whether they are identified as  below-poverty-line (BPL) cases or people who are better off.”
This is why the scheme is being rushed through with a dangerously  inappropriate deadline of 1 January for 51 districts. It will be  cascaded to 18 states by 1 April 2013, and the whole country by the end

of 2013 or early 2014.
This is an impossible deadline. Even though the PM has announced that  direct cash transfers will happen in 51 districts from 1 January –  which is less than 35 days away – The Times of India reports

that only 20 of these 51 districts are Aadhaar-compliant. The Unique ID  Authority of India (UIDAI) has promised to finish all 51 districts by 1  January, but holding an Aadhaar card is not the same as

making the  scheme successful.
Here’s why.
One, the card merely identifies the recipient as the right  beneficiary. Making payments based on direct cash transfers means having  banking infrastructure in almost every village in every district.

Every  beneficiary has to have a bank account. Bankers are not saying they are  ready as yet.
Two, it’s not just about sending the cash to the right  account. In a social system where might is right, handing over so much  cash to the poor runs its own risks. While the idea is to credit the  accounts of

the women in households, this assumes that the menfolk have  no say over how the money is spent. If people have to trundle several  miles to a bank/ATM branch to collect their cash, the possibility of

their being mugged on the way has to be seen as a possibility. More so  in rural areas where caste thugs abound, and the law and order machinery  is weak.
Three, it is also naïve to believe that crooks will not  figure out how to make money from cash- based transfers. In the NREGA  make-work scheme, a large chunk of the beneficiaries have figured out a

way to collect wages without work, so the assumption that cash transfers  will reach the right people has to be tested against ground realities  during actual implementation. The UPA rush will ensure that

this does  not happen.
Four, the new cash-in-your-account plan will partially  supplant the current system of food procurement and distribution through  ration shops. If all food subsidies are shifted to cash, what will  happen to

the elaborate system of giving farmers minimum support prices,  procuring grain from them through the Food Corporation, and supplying  fair-price shops? Will it just be dismantled?
Five, a shift to cash could mean major shifts in consumption  patterns even for the poor. When I get wheat in physical form, I use it  to cook my meals or sell it in the open market to buy what I want. But

when I get cash instead of wheat, my family might suddenly switch to  more tastier, protein-rich foods like milk, eggs, or even meat. Not to  speak of vegetables, fruits and processed foods. These were

the major  causes of high food inflation in the last few years, but is the  government prepared for this shift?
Six, cash makes sense if the only idea is to efficiently  transfer purchasing power from government coffers to intended  beneficiaries, as Shrayana Bhhattacharya and Lant Pritchett write in The Indian

Express. But what if your idea is to provide adequate nutrition to pregnant  women, and give them money instead? Will mothers buy the right foods to  ensure they receive the right nutrition or will they

just spend it on  food that is cheaper? Would nutritional supplements work better here, or  a mix of food and cash?
Seven, unlike in the past, when Sonia Gandhi‘s  National Advisory Council (NAC) was rooting for all kinds of voter  giveaways, this time around people like Jean Dreze and Harsh Mander are  not

rooting for cash transfers. They seem to have figured out that Sonia  is not thinking as much about the poor as about their votes.
Eight, cash is good, for it makes customers out of poor  supplicants, but the fact remains that in a diverse country like India,  one size may not fit all. Some states have fairly efficient public  distribution

systems while others may be handicapped. Should the UPA be  asking all states to opt for cash transfers when some states may be more  comfortable with the existing system?
Forget all states, one size may not fit even fit all districts within  the same state. When one end of Uttar Pradesh – the western end – is  richer than the other end – the eastern one – the two may need

different  treatment. One state may have a large tribal population, while another  may be fully urbanised. Cash may work better with the latter.
The PM knows the problems, but has decided to make a dash for cash  because he knows that Sonia Gandhi’s political support will come only  during election time.
This is not to say that cash transfers are a bad idea. This writer  certainly is all for cash transfers provided it is done carefully,  researched, and redesigned before a broader rollout. Also, the effort  must

be to specifically eliminate the rich and the middle classes  substantially right in the beginning.
The mistake is in trying to rush with a scheme that has been inadequately tested before such a huge rollout.
As we noted, Manmohan Singh knows the pitfalls. This is why he spelt out the challenges ahead.  “The twin pillars for the success of the system of DCTs (direct cash  transfers) that we have envisioned

are the Aadhaar platform and  financial inclusion. If either of these pillars is weak, it would  endanger the success of the initiative. I would expect the finance  ministry and the Unique Identification

Authority to work in close  coordination to achieve a collective goal,” the PM said while clearing  the new rollout plan.
But this is only about implementing it to get the money to the voter.  The principal flaw in his view is that he does not emphasise  ‘exclusion’ of the undeserving as much as ‘inclusion’. If the scheme  fails

to eliminate non-merit beneficiaries, the government could end up  giving a lot more subsidies to the undeserving.
The problem is simple: the system of subsidies has been tough to  eliminate even when half the money does not reach the beneficiaries. How  is it supposed to cut expenditures if the money reaches all

the  intended beneficiaries, and without eliminating those who can afford to  pay full prices? Which government has the political strength necessary  to stand up to potential voters and tell them they are

not entitled to  subsidies?
As an editorial in Business Standard points out, “if it is politically problematic to control subsidies  today, it may become even harder when cash transfers become a reality.”  It adds: “The question that

must be asked is: when transfers become  easier for governments to pull off, through Aadhaar-linked bank  accounts, what will happen to India’s public finances?”
It is worth recalling that the UPA has not been able to reform  spending in more than eight-and-a-half years at the helm. It is stupid  to expect that it will correct the system when elections are just a

hop-skip-and-jump away.
The reforms are over. Efforts to fix the fiscal deficit are coming to  an end. The cash transfer scheme, given the proposed speed of the  rollout, will end up becoming a political vote-buying exercise

rather  than a real attempt at reform. DCTS is essentially being used as a Rahul Gandhi election funds.
Mahatma Gandhi said that the end cannot justify the means. Cash  transfer is a good means that could end up being used for corrupt  electoral ends. It may well worsen the problem of subsidies and set

the  Indian economy back by another five years.

FROM QUORA.COM..... FDI in retail.. different views


Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is a very sensitive topic, more so if it is in retails. I would put forward my ideas under two broad point-

1. FDI in general
2. FDI in retail

Why does a country seek FDI? Primarily for two reasons-

1. Technological advances brought by the Multi National Companies (MNCs)
2. Capital brought by the MNCs

What is the final aim to seek FDI? Development, if I am not wrong.

First we would understand the term Development.

1. Development is not just growth of GDP/GNP. As Mahboob-ul-Haq and Amartya Sen have identified Development must mean development in nutrition, education and health in addition to economic

development.

2. In the current situation development has been defined as consisting of three concepts-
              a. Economic Vitality
              b. Ecological Sustainability
              c. Social equity

Utsa Patnaik has shown that since 1993-94 (that is after liberalization) poverty has grown in India from 59% to 76%.

Why should FDI not be allowed in India-

1. Our regulatory regime is very weak and buckles under pressure too easily for example GAAR has been postponed, even though it was known that it was a necessary measure to curb abuse of various

provisions, just because it was sending a wrong signal to Foreign Investors. Here one would like to ask whether FDI is for India or India is for FDI.
2. Now it is well documented that Multi National Companies just like Companies of yore have not changed their technique of bribing politicians to gain access to vital re-sources. In such situation Citizen

just becomes a pawn in the hand of Politician-MNC nexus.
3. Money Drain: Off-course it is nobody's concern but it is also a fact that hefty amount of profit and salary etc. will go outside India.
4. FDI should be for our purpose and not because sentiments of Foreign Investors are negative or because rating agencies are giving low ranking to India or that Prime Minister is being called under-

achiever.
5. Economy is under strain, accepted but any development pattern with focus on only 3-4% of the population will ultimately remain flimsy. India has huge capability to grow with internal resources. We

have to educate people, provide dwellings to them and provide employment opportunities to them. If we try to focus on these aspects we would not need FDI for growth.
6. The aim is not just economy in operations but also peace in the society. What happened in the Manesar. Such kind of employment will only create problem in the society. (Labourers were being paid

peanuts in the name of salary-Rs. 5000/- while they had to spend Rs. 2000/- as rent only for a single room).
7. MNCs have the dubious nature of capturing the whole market and thereby discouraging local entrepreneurship. For example government was under strain when Ranbaxy was acquired by an MNC.
8. We remember Posco and Niyamgiri tribals. We also remember threatened beautiful Olive Ridley Turtles. Can we be oblivious to what future we are going to leave for our coming generations?

Why should FDI not be allowed in retail?

1. In India farmer who is 52% of the population is also a consumer. If Farmer is paid more and then also charged more it will serve no purpose for example during 2nd world war farmers were getting

very good price for crop so they, most of them, sold their produce to get better price. After some times price of grains sky-rocketted and they had to purchase same grain at much higher price.
2. Organised retail does not decrease the prices. For example a branded shirt, produced in India can be bought for lets say Rs. 600/- in local shop, will be sold for Rs. 2000/- in organised retail shop after

giving it a brand name.
3. MNCs, by virtue of their prowess in purchasing in bulk often dictate terms to local manufacturers. They buy cheap and sale at high cost. The resulting profit is not shared by various middlemen as

happens in traditional system, rather it is devoured by Corporate.
4. MNCs create wide gulf in the society. Ratio of the compensation being given to CEO and that being given to a shop-floor employee will tell everything. Actually what they are doing is to re-distribute

the income in such a way that maximum profit accumulates with a limited number of people.
5. Experience of shopping. Yes, they give very good shopping experience because of their trained marketing personnels. Are we ready to sacrifice interest of so many of our fellow citizens just for the

sake of this experience. Think it otherwise. (If you have seen Matrix, movie) would you like to live in an artificial environment which gives you kicks of pleasure, thereby losing your human-ness, your

individuality.

Accepted there is a capital crunch in the Country but that crunch is not because of lack of capital formation but because of lack of trust on the market. People keep investing in dead assets like Gold and

Land. Reliance on the speculative FIIs has hurt the market most in the long-term. 2ndly even if we need FDI it is not needed in retail. There is no crisis in the retail sector. We have already allowed FDI

in sectors where investment is needed and situation calls for urgent action for example in infrastructure, manufacturing etc.








SWOT Analysis of Retail Sector:
1. Strengths:
x Major contribution to GDP: the retail sector in India is hovering around 33-35% of GDP as compared to around 20% in USA.
x High Growth Rate: the retail sector in India enjoys an extremely high growth rate of approximately 46%.
x High Potential: since the organised portion of retail sector is only 2-3%, thereby creating lot of potential for future players.
x High Employment Generator: the retail sector employs 7% of work
force in India, which is rite now limited to unorganised sector only.Once the reforms get implemented this percentage is likely to increase substantially.

2. Weaknesses (limitation):
x Lack of Competitors: AT Kearney‘s study on global retailing trends found that India is least competitive as well as least saturated markets of the world.
x Highly Unorganised: The unorganised portion of retail sector is only 97% as compared to US, which is only 20%.
x Low Productivity: Mckinsey study claims retail productivity in India is very low as compared to its international peers.
x Shortage of Talented Professionals: the retail trade business in
India is not considered as reputed profession and is mostly carried out by the family members (self-employment and captive business). Such people are not academically and professionally qualified.
x NoµIndustry‘ status, hence creating financial issues for
retailers: the retail sector in India does not enjoy industry status in India, thereby making difficult for retailers to raise funds.
               
 3. Opportunities (benefits):
x There will be more organization in the sector: Organized retail
will need more workers. According to findings of KPMG , in China, the employment in both retail and wholesale trade increased from 4% in 1992 to about 7% in 2001, post reforms and innovative

competition in retail sector in that country.
x Healthy Competition will be boosted and there will be a
check on the prices (inflation):Retail giants such as Walmart,
Carrefour, Tesco, Target and other global retail companies already have operations in other countries for over 30 years. Until now, they have not at all become monopolies rather they have managed to

keep a check on the food inflation through their healthy competitive practices.
x Create transparency in the system: the intermediaries operating
as per mandi norms do not have transparency in their pricing. According to some of the reports, an average Indian farmer realises only one-third of theprice, which the final consumer pays.
x Intermediaries and mandi system will be evicted, hence directly benefiting the farmers and producers: the prices of
commodities will automatically be checked. For example, according to Business Standard, Walmart has introduced ³Direct Farm Project´ at Haider Nagar in Punjab, where 110 farmers have been

connected with Bharti Walmart for sourcing fresh vegetables directly.
x Quality Control and Control over Leakage and Wastage:
due to organisation of the sector, 40% of the production does not reach the ultimate consumer. According to the news in Times of India, 42% of the children below the age group of 5 are malnourished

and Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh has termed it as ³national shame´. Food often gets rot infarm, in transit and in state-run warehouses. Cost conscious and highly competitive retailers will try to

avoid these wastages and losses and it will be their endeavour to make quality products available at lowest prices, hence making food available to weakest and poorest segment of Indian society.
x Heavy flow of capital will help in building up the infrastructure for the growing population: India is already
operating in budgetary deficit. Neither the government of India nor domesticinvestors are capable of satisfying the growing needs (school, hospitals, transport etc.) of the ever growing Indian population.

Hence foreign capital inflow will enable us to create a heavy capital base.
x There will be sustainable development and many other economic issues will be focussed upon:many Indian small shop
   owners employ workers, who are not under any contract and also under aged workers giving rise to child-labour. It also boosts corruption and black money.

4. Threats:
x Current Independent Stores will be compelled to close:
This will lead to massive job loss as most of the operations in big stores like Walmart are highly automated requiring less work force.
x Big players can knock-out competition: they can afford to lower prices in initial stages, become monopoly and then raise prise later.
x India does not need foreign retailers: as they can satisfy the whole domestic demand.
x Remember East India Company it entered India as trader and then took over politically.
x The government hasn‘t able to build consensus.
In view of the above analysis, if we try to balance opportunities and prospects attached to the given economic reforms, it will definitely cause good to Indian economy and consequently to public at large,

if once implemented. Thus the period for which we delay these reforms will be loss for government only, since majority of the public is in favour of reforms. All the above mentioned drawbacks are mostly

politically created. With the implementation of this policy all stakeholders will benefit whether it is consumer through quality products at low price, farmers through more transparency in trading or

Indian corporates with 49% profit share remaining with Indian companies only.


Saturday, December 8, 2012

kollidam block


    Kollidam Block
      It is spread over 231.54 sq.kms. Kollidam block is situated on the northern most corner of the district bordering Cuddalore District. 76% of the people are engaged in agriculture. Rest are engaged in other activities. Surplus agriculture labourer can be diverted to take up some lucrative ventures. Thirumullaivasal where fishing activity is taking place in good amount offers good scope for marine based items such as fish processing, ice candy, fish pickle, nylon nets. Apart from this, there is scope for activities on fly ash bricks, readymade garments, modern rice mill, oil palm cultivation, electronic toys, repairing and servicing of motor boats etc. Korai mat weaving and cane furniture for which Kollidam and its surrounding villages are known for can expand their activities so as to cater to the needs of other states apart from their local market. Embroidery, tyre carts, mosaic tiles, repairing and servicing of automobiles offer good scope. Further as this area is very fertile and well irrigated, horticulture product cultivation farm cum processing centres can be set up in and around Kollidam. In addition to tobacco cultivation and floriculture, especially jasmine can be cultivated in good area as this soil is good for that. An industry for extracting jasmine oil can be set up after bringing substantial area under cultivation.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

sustain... survive...


NAM

India should use NAM as a platform to serve its national interest. NAM should be revived in order to cope with the changing world order to make it a   most influential organisation. This would help India bcz it is the future super power and we could play a decisive role in multilateral forum and also in shaping the current world order
NAM should develop agenda on human rights, democracy, cyber threats ad multiculturalism.
NAM should persuade members to develop tolerance, secularism, forward-looking thinking among its masses...

Friday, May 11, 2012

biology notes


ECOLOGY:
Ramdeo Misra-- Father of Ecology in India.
Government of India established the National Committee for Environmental Planning and Coordination (1972) which, in later years, paved the way for the establishment of the Ministry of Environment and Forests (1984).
*Ecology-studies the interactions among organisms and between the organism and its physical (abiotic) environment. Ecology is basically concerned with four levels of biological organisation – organisms, populations, communities and biomes.
*physico-chemical (abiotic) components alone do not characterisethe habitat of an organism completely; the habitat includes biotic components also – pathogens, parasites, predators and competitors – of the organism with which they interacts constantly.
*A few organisms can tolerate and thrive in a wide range of temperatures (they are called eurythermal), but, vast majority of them are restricted to a narrow range of temperatures (such organisms are called stenothermal)
*For aquatic organisms the quality (chemical composition, pH) of water becomes important. The salt concentration (measured as salinity in parts per thousand), is less than 5 per cent in inland waters, 30-35 per cent the sea and > 100 per cent in some hypersaline lagoons. Some organisms are tolerant of a wide range of salinities (euryhaline) but others are restricted to a narrow range (stenohaline). Many freshwater animals cannot live for long in sea water and vice versa because of the osmotic problems, they would face
*many species would have evolved a relatively constant internal (within the body) environment that permits all biochemical reactions, physiological functions to proceed with maximal efficiency. This constancy could be in terms of optimal temperature and osmotic concentration of body fluids. then organism should try to maintain the constancy of its internal environment (a process called
homeostasis) despite varying external
environmental conditions.
*the ‘success’ of mammals is largely due to their ability
to maintain a constant body temperature and thrive whether they live in Antarctica or in the Sahara desert
*Heat loss or heat gain is a function of surface area. Since small animals have a larger surface area relative to their volume, they tend to lose body heat very fast when it is cold outside; then they have to expend much energy to generate body heat through metabolism. This is the main reason why very small animals are rarely found in polar regions
*Some snails and fish go into aestivation to avoid summer–related problems-heat and desiccation. Under unfavourable conditions many zooplankton species in lakes and ponds are known to enter diapause, a stage of suspended development.
*Mammals from colder climates generally have shorter ears and limbs to minimise heat loss. (This is called the Allen’s Rule.) In the polar seas aquatic mammals like seals have a thick layer of fat (blubber) below their skin that acts as an insulator and reduces loss of body heat.
*altitude sickness--symptoms include nausea, fatigue and heart palpitations. This is because in the low atmospheric pressure of high altitudes, the body does not get enough oxygen. The body compensates low oxygen availability by increasing red blood cell production, decreasing the binding capacity of hemoglobin and by increasing breathing rate.
*An individual may have births and deaths, but a population has birth rates and death rates. In a population these rates refer to per capita births & deaths, respectively.
*Ideally, when resources in the habitat are unlimited, each species has the ability to realise fully its innate potential to grow in number, as Darwin observed while developing his theory of natural selection. Then the population grows in an exponential or geometric fashion.
             birth rate-death rate= r.                                            r- intrinsic rate of natural increase and is a very important parameter chosen for assessing impacts of any biotic or abiotic factor on population growth.
*Population size, more technically called population density (designated as N), need not necessarily be measured in numbers only.
*The number of fish caught per trap is good enough measure of its total population density in the lake. We are mostly obliged to estimate population sizes indirectly, without actually counting them or seeing them. The tiger census in our national parks and tiger reserves is often based on pug marks and fecal pellets.
*A plot of N in relation to time (t) results in a sigmoid curve. This type of population growth is called Verhulst-Pearl Logistic Growth
*Some organisms breed only once in their lifetime (Pacific salmon fish, bamboo) while others breed many times during their lifetime (most birds and mammals)
*Assigning a ‘+’ sign for beneficial interaction, ‘-’ sign for detrimental and 0 for neutral interaction…
Species A      Species B       Name of Interaction
+                   +            Mutualism
–                      –             Competition
+                  –               Predation
+                   –                 Parasitism
+                0                 Commensalism
–                 0                  Amensalism

*Biological control methods adopted in agricultural pest control are based on the ability of the predator to regulate prey population. Predators also help in maintaining species diversity in a community, by reducing the intensity of competition among competing prey species.
*Nearly 25 per cent of all insects are known to be phytophagous (feeding on plant sap and other parts of plants)
*weed Calotropis growing in abandoned fields produces highly poisonous cardiac glycosides and that is why you never see any cattle or goats browsing on this plant. A wide variety of chemical substances extracted from plants (nicotine, caffeine, quinine, strychnine, opium, etc.,) are produced actually as defences against grazers and browsers.
*competition is best defined as a process in which the
fitness of one species (measured in terms of its ‘r’ the intrinsic rate of increase) is significantly lower in the presence of another species.
*in some shallow South American lakes visiting flamingoes and resident fishes compete for their common food, the zooplankton in the lake. Abingdon tortoise in Galapagos Islands became extinct within a decade after goats were introduced on the island, apparently due to the greater browsing efficiency of the goats.
*In general, herbivores and plants appear to be more adversely affected by competition than carnivores.
*Gause’s ‘Competitive Exclusion Principle’ states that two closely related species competing for the same resources cannot co-exist indefinitely and the competitively inferior one will be eliminated eventually
But species facing competition might evolve mechanisms that promote co-existence rather than exclusion. One such mechanism is ‘resource partitioning’. If two species compete for the same resource, they could avoid competition by choosing, for instance, different times for feeding or different foraging patterns.
*The life cycles of parasites are often complex, involving one or two intermediate hosts or vectors to facilitate parasitisation of its primary host.
*Parasites that feed on the external surface of the host organism are called ectoparasites
*The female mosquito is not considered a parasite.
*endoparasites are those that live inside the host body at different sites (liver, kidney, lungs, red blood cells, etc.).
*Brood parasitism in birds is a fascinating example of parasitism in which the parasitic bird lays its eggs in the nest of its host
*Commensalism: This is the interaction in which one species benefits and the other is neither harmed nor benefited. An orchid growing as an epiphyte on a mango branch, and barnacles growing on the back of a whale benefit while neither the mango tree nor the whale derives any apparent benefit. The cattle egret and grazing cattle in close association, the interaction between sea anemone that has stinging tentacles and the clown fish,- examples of commensalism.
*Mutualism: This interaction confers benefits on both the interacting species. Lichens represent an intimate mutualistic relationship between a fungus and photosynthesising algae or cyanobacteria. Similarly, the mycorrhizae are associations between fungi and the
roots of higher plants. The fungi help the plant in the absorption of essential nutrients from the soil while the plant in turn provides the fungi with energy-yielding carbohydrates.


ECOSYSTEM – terrestrial & aquatic.
Forest, grassland and desert - examples of terrestrial ecosystems; pond, lake, wetland, river and estuary - examples of aquatic ecosystems. Crop fields and an aquarium may also be considered as man-made ecosystems.
*Vertical distribution of different species occupying
different levels is called stratification. For example, trees occupy top vertical strata or layer of a forest, shrubs the second and herbs and grasses occupy the bottom layers.
*Primary production is defined as the amount of biomass or organic matter produced per unit area over a time period by
plants during photosynthesis. It is expressed in terms of weight (g –2) or energy (kcal m–2). The rate of biomass production is called productivity. It is expressed in terms of g–2 yr –1 or (kcal m–2) yr–1.
*Gross primary productivity GPP of an ecosystem is the rate of production of organic matter during photosynthesis. A considerable amount of GPP is utilised by plants in respiration. Gross primary productivity minus respiration losses (R), is the net primary productivity (NPP).
*Net primary productivity is the available biomass for the consumption to heterotrophs (herbiviores and decomposers). Primary productivity depends on the plant species inhabiting a particular area, variety of environmental factors, availability of nutrients and photosynthetic capacity of plants.
*Secondary productivity is defined as the rate of formation of new organic matter by consumers.
* The annual net primary productivity of the whole biosphere is approximately 170 billion tons(dry weight) of organic matter. Of this, despite occupying about 70 percent of the surface, the productivity of the oceans are only 55 billion tons
* decomposers break down complex organic matter into inorganic substances like carbon dioxide, water and nutrients and the process is called decomposition. Dead plant remains such as leaves, bark, flowers and dead remains of animals, including fecal matter, constitute detritus, which is the raw material for decomposition
* Detritivores (e.g., earthworm) break down detritus into smaller particles. This process is called fragmentation. By the process of leaching, water soluble inorganic nutrients go down into the soil horizon and get precipitated as unavailable salts. Bacterial and fungal enzymes degrade detritus into simpler inorganic substances. This process is called as catabolism.
all the above steps in decomposition operate simultaneously on the detritus
* Humification leads to accumulation of a dark coloured amorphous substance called humus that is highly resistant to microbial action and undergoes decomposition at an extremely slow rate. Being colloidal in nature it serves as a reservoir of nutrients. The humus is further degraded by some microbes and release of inorganic nutrients occur by the process known as mineralization
* Decomposition is largely an oxygen-requiring process
* In a particular climatic condition, decomposition rate is slower if detritus is rich in lignin and chitin, and quicker, if detritus is rich in nitrogen and water-soluble substances.
* Of the incident solar radiation less than 50 per cent of it is photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). Plants capture only 2-10 per cent of the PAR and this small amount of energy sustains the entire living world.
* ecosystems are not exempt from the Second Law of thermodynamics
* A simple grazing food chain (GFC) is GRASS TO GOAT TO MAN
* The detritus food chain (DFC) begins with dead organic matter. It is made up of decomposers which are heterotrophic organisms, mainly fungi and bacteria. They meet their energy and nutrient requirements by degrading dead organic matter or detritus. These are also known as saprotrophs (sapro: to decompose). Decomposers secrete digestive enzymes that breakdown dead and waste materials into simple, inorganic materials, which are subsequently absorbed by them.
*In an aquatic ecosystem, GFC is the major conduit for energy flow. As against this, in a terrestrial ecosystem, a much larger fraction of energy flows through the detritus food chain than through the GFC. Detritus food chain may be connected with the grazing food chain at some levels: some of the organisms of DFC are prey to the GFC animals, and in a natural ecosystem, some animals like cockroaches, crows, etc., are omnivores.
These natural interconnection of food chains make it a food web
* The amount of energy decreases at successive trophic levels
*Each trophic level has a certain mass of living material at a particular time called as the standing crop. The standing crop is measured as the mass of living organisms (biomass) or the number in a unit area. The biomass of a species is expressed in terms of fresh or dry weight. Measurement of biomass in terms of dry weight is more accurate.
*The number of trophic levels in the grazing food chain is restricted as the transfer of energy follows 10 per cent law – only 10 per cent of the energy is transferred to each trophic level from the lower trophic level. In nature, it is possible to have so many levels – producer, herbivore, primary carnivore, secondary carnivore in the grazing food chain.
*the trophic level represents a functional level, not a species as such. A given species may occupy more than one trophic level in the same ecosystem at the same time
*energy at a lower trophic level is always more than at a higher level.
*Pyramid of energy is always upright, can never be inverted, because when energy flows from a particular trophic level to the next trophic level, some energy is always lost as heat at each step. Each bar in the energy pyramid indicates the amount of energy present at each trophic level in a given time or annually per unit area.
*ecological pyramids does not take into account the same species belonging to two or more trophic levels. It assumes a simple food chain, something that almost never exists in nature; it does not accommodate a food web. Moreover, saprophytes are not given any place in ecological pyramids even though they play a vital role in the ecosystem.
*composition and structure constantly change in response to the changing environmental conditions. This change is orderly and sequential, parallel with the changes in the physical environment. These changes lead finally to a community that is in near equilibrium with the environment and that is called a climax community. The gradual and fairly predictable change in the species composition of a given area is called ecological
succession. During succession some species colonise an area and their populations become more numerous, whereas populations of other species decline and even disappear.
*The entire sequence of communities that successively change in a given area are called sere(s). The individual transitional communities are termed seral stages or seral communities.
*succession and evolution would have been parallel processes at that time.
*Succession is hence a process that starts where no living organisms. - primary succession. Ex; newly cooled lava.
  Areas that lost all the living organisms that
existed there.- secondary succession. Ex: abandoned farmlands, burned forests. secondry succession is faster than primary succession
*Hydrarch succession takes place in wetter areas and the
successional series progress from hydric to the mesic conditions. As against this, xerarch succession takes place in dry areas and the series progress from xeric to mesic conditions. Hence, both hydrarch and xerach successions lead to medium water conditions (mesic) – neither too dry (xeric) nor too wet (hydric).
*The species that invade a bare area are called pioneer species. *In primary succession on rocks these are usually lichens which are able to secrete acids to dissolve rock, helping in weathering and soil formation. These later pave way to bryophytes,… ultimately a stable climax forest community is formed. The climax community remains stable as long as the environment remains unchanged.
*In secondary succession the species that invade depend on the
condition of the soil, availability of water, the environment as also the seeds or other propagules present
*The amount of nutrients, such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, etc..present in the soil at any given time, is referred to as the standing state.
*nutrients never lost.
*The movement of nutrient elements through the various components of an ecosystem is called nutrient cycling. Another name of nutrient cycling is biogeochemical cycles (bio: living organism, geo: rocks, air, water).  
*Nutrient cycles-two types: (a) gaseous and (b) sedimentary
*reservoir for gaseous type of nutrient cycle (e.g., nitrogen, carbon cycle) exists in the atmosphere and for the sedimentary cycle (e.g., sulphur and phosphorus cycle), the reservoir is located in Earth’s crust.
*Environmental factors, e.g., soil, moisture, pH, temperature etc., regulate the rate of release of nutrients into the atmosphere.
*4 × 10^13 kg of carbon is fixed in the biosphere through photosynthesis annually
*The natural reservoir of phosphorus is rock, which contains phosphorus in the form of phosphates. When rocks are weathered, minute amounts of these phosphates dissolve in soil solution and are absorbed by the roots of the plants. Herbivores and other animals obtain this element from plants. The waste products and the dead organisms are decomposed  by phosphate-solubilising bacteria releasing phosphorus.
*Energy flow is unidirectional.
*The biotic community is dynamic

BIODIVERSITY
*Biodiversity is the term popularized by the sociobiologist Edward Wilson
*More than 70 per cent of all the species recorded are animals, while plants (including algae, fungi, bryophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms) comprise no more than 22 per cent of the total. Among animals, insects are the most species-rich taxonomic group, making up more than 70 per cent of the total
*india’s share of the global species diversity is an impressive 8.1 per cent. One of 12 mega diversity countries
*species diversity decreases as we move away from the equator towards the poles
*tropics (latitudinal range of 23.5° N to 23.5° S) harbour more species than temperate or polar areas
*temperate regions subjected to frequent glaciations in the past, tropical latitudes have remained relatively undisturbed for millions of years.
*the relation between species richness and area for a wide variety of taxa (angiosperm plants, birds, bats, freshwater fishes) turns out to be a rectangular hyperbola.
*increased diversity contributed to higher productivity
*rivet popper hypothesis used by ecologist Paul Ehrlich
*amphibians appear to be more vulnerable to extinction
*‘bioprospecting’ (exploring molecular, genetic and species-level diversity for products of economic importance
*When we conserve and protect the whole ecosystem, its biodiversity at all levels is protected - we save the entire forest to save the tiger. This approach is called in situ (on site) conservation
*Ex situ Conservation– In this approach, threatened animals and plants are taken out from their natural habitat and placed in special setting where they can be protected and given special care. Zoological parks,botanical gardens and wildlife safari parks, in vitro fertilisation, tissue culture propagation and cryopreservation of gametes.
*Convention on Biological Diversity (‘The Earth Summit’) held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, called upon all nations to take appropriate measures for conservation of biodiversity and sustainable utilisation of its benefits.
*the World Summit on Sustainable Development held in 2002 in Johannesburg
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
*Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to protect and improve the quality of our environment (air, water and soil
*According to Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), particulate size 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter (PM 2.5) are responsible for causing the greatest harm to human health. These fine particulates can be inhaled deep into the lungs and can cause breathing and respiratory symptoms, irritation, inflammations and damage to the lungs and premature deaths
*Catalytic converters, having expensive metals namely platinum-palladium and rhodium as the catalysts, are fitted into automobiles for reducing emission of poisonous gases. As the exhaust passes through the catalytic converter, unburnt hydrocarbons are converted into carbon dioxide and water, and carbon monoxide and nitric oxide are changed to carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas, respectively. Motor vehicles equipped with catalytic converter should use unleaded petrol because lead in the petrol inactivates the catalyst.
*CNG burns most efficiently, unlike petrol or diesel, in the automobiles and very little of it is left unburnt. Moreover, CNG is cheaper than petrol or diesel, cannot be siphoned off by thieves and adulterated like petrol or diesel.
*Euro II norms, for example, stipulates that sulphur be controlled at 350 parts-per-million (ppm) in diesel and 150 ppm in petrol. Aromatic hydrocarbons are to be contained at 42 per cent of the concerned fuel. The goal, according to the roadmap, is to reduce sulphur to 50 ppm in petrol and diesel.
*the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act came into force in 1981, but was amended in 1987 to include noise as an air pollutant
*Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 to safeguard our water resources
*Micro-organisms involved in biodegradation of organic matter in the receiving water body consume a lot of oxygen, and as a result there is a sharp decline in dissolved oxygen downstream from the point of sewage discharge. This causes mortality of fish and other aquatic creatures.
*hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), the world’s most problematic aquatic weed- ‘Terror of Bengal’
*Biomagnification refers to increase in concentration of the toxicant at successive trophic levels. This happens because a toxic substance accumulated by an organism cannot be metabolised or excreted, and is thus passed on to the next higher trophic level. This phenomenon is well-known for mercury and DDT.
*High concentrations of DDT disturb calcium metabolism in birds, which causes thinning of eggshell and their premature breaking, eventually causing decline in bird populations.
*Eutrophication is the natural aging of a lake by biological enrichment of its water. natural aging of a lake may span thousands of years. However, pollutants from man’s activities like effluents from the industries and homes can radically accelerate the aging process. This phenomenon has been called Cultural or Accelerated Eutrophication. The prime contaminants are nitrates and phosphates, which act as plant nutrients.
*Thermal wastewater eliminates or reduces the number of organisms sensitive to high temperature, and may enhance the growth Of plants and fish in extremely cold areas but, only after causing damage to the indigenous flora and fauna.
*dry composting toilets- human excreta can be recycled into a resource (as natural fertilizer), which reduces the need for chemical fertilizers. There are working ‘EcoSan’ toilets in many areas of Kerala and Sri Lanka.
*Polyblend, a fine powder of recycled modified plastic. This mixture is mixed with the bitumen that is used to lay roads.
*Integrated organic farming is a cyclical, zero-waste procedure, where waste products from one process are cycled in as nutrients for other processes. This allows the maximum utilisation of resource and increases the efficiency of production.
*The thickness of the ozone in a column of air from the ground to the top of the atmosphere is measured in terms of Dobson units (DU).
*In human eye, cornea absorbs UV-B radiation, and a high dose of UV-B causes inflammation of cornea, called snow-blindness cataract, etc. Such exposure may permanently damage the cornea.
*the Montreal Protocol, was signed at Montreal (Canada) in 1987 (effective in 1989) to control the emission of ozone depleting substances.
*National Forest Policy (1988) of India has recommended 33 per cent forest cover for the plains and 67 per cent for the hills.

Biofortification – breeding crops with higher levels of vitamins and minerals, or higher protein and healthier fats – is the most practical means to improve public health.
*This capacity to generate a whole plant from any cell/explant is called totipotency